RSS
 

Voting-I-AP

17 Nov

It sounded like the liberal politicians were preparing people for foul play. They told people that the races where Republicans are ahead would be just red mirages since Democrats tend to vote later and through the mail. That sounds like they were planning a replay of the Georgia election in 2020. They will wait for most of the ballots to be counted and when they know how much they are going to lose by, a large number of mail-in ballots will show up with no envelope so there is no postmark and no signature to compare against the signature on the ballots so they can’t be verified as legitimate. Under mail-in rules, either lack of signature on the envelope or lack of postmark would disqualify them but the ones in charge of the counting chose to count them anyway and so a win for Trump became a win for Biden and it changed the election. While there may not have been any tampering with the vote, mail-in voting leaves a lot of room for tampering, which raises the possibility that there might have been. A lot of Republicans were ahead in the beginning of this election but as the night wore on, the tallies turned more for Democrats so the Democrats won the Senate though they lost the House. Mail-in ballots do not allow for ID or face verification like a walk-in ballot does. While a signature on the envelope and a postmark show it was mailed and the ballot was filled out by  the one that mailed in the ballot, it does not guarantee that the person mailing it is the one registered to vote. In addition, the ballot passes through many hands and any one of them could remove the ballots and replace them with a pre-made-up ballot. Without an envelope, there isn’t even any guarantee that it even came through the mail. It is very convenient to sit at home and drop your ballot in the mail but it is too easy for someone to tamper with the ballot enroute to the polling place.

 

 
 

Marriage-III-F

16 Nov

Liberals are determined to use the lame duck session to pass every disreputable law that they can. They passed the “Respect For Marriage Act” in the House and it is to come up in the Senate tomorrow (11/16/2022).  Voters supposedly voted many of these representatives back into office for the next session. That is hard to imagine since liberals have been very open about their intent to pass this law. The law would equate belief in traditional marriage with racism and subject parents and those who believe in traditional marriage to prosecution in order to intimidate them into silence. It would further subject adoption agencies, women’s shelters, and other non-profits to lawsuits if they don’t bow to the LGBT agenda, even if compliance with the law would threaten the safety of those they serve. It would also open those agencies up to private lawsuits designed to harass them. These lawsuits would drain the agency’s funds needed to carry out their work and deprive the people they serve of much needed services. It would also require the federal government to recognize any same-sex marriage that was legal where it was entered into. That would overturn the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 which bars the federal government from recognizing same sex marriages and would overrule the State’s right to set their marriage requirements. It would impose federal control of marriage. That would violate the Constitution which does not give the federal government that authority and states that any authority not granted to the federal government by the Constitution falls under State control.  

 
 

Video-Remembering Uganda- a year later

14 Nov

 

Tenth Sunday of Kingdomtide-Nov 13-B

13 Nov

Church and State-B Jesus illustrated the real separation of church and State when asked about the taxes. He stated that we should render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s and unto God, that which is God’s. Since God created everything, everything is under His domain, including the government. However, God has established governments to keep the peace and maintain order and taxes and laws are necessary to carry out their responsibility. Since God created life for a purpose, only He has the right to determine when it ends and since God laid down the ground rules in the Ten Commandments, man does not have the right to change them or set them aside. The government is established to enforce them, but does not have the right to abolish them or change them. The Constitution recognizes that we have certain God-given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and established procedures to protect them through the safeguards it established. The liberal politicians do not recognize God, so they do not recognize anything as being under God’s domain. They believe that their right to pursue happiness takes precedence over other people’s right to life and liberty, and feel they can change the law or set it aside when they wish, in order to pursue their right to happiness. Clearly there is a conflict of world views. Everyone must choose who he will follow, God or man. God has set before us life and death. Following God will result in life and following man will result in death, because disobeying God is sin and the wages of sin is death. Eve chose the fruit of disobedience over the fruit of following God and many people today still choose the way of death. Many today do not know they have a choice and choose death by default. The church needs to teach them the way of life.

———————————————————————————————-

 

Tenth Sunday of Kingdomtide-Nov 13-A

13 Nov

Church and State-A Liberal politicians cry out when Christians call for protecting life, saying that the Constitution requires a separation of church and State. It does but not like they say. The Constitution prohibits the government from passing laws restricting the free exercise of religion. It does not prohibit the church from voicing its opinion on religious matters. Speaking one’s views on the value of life falls under the Constitution’s protection of free speech. You do not lose the protection of the Constitution simply because you are a Christian. Without God, man seeks only his own best interest. He can say that he wants what is best for everyone, but when it comes to doing it, he puts his interest before everyone else’s. That creates conflict as every man seeks his own interest. If four people have one pie, they cannot all have all of it. God calls us to seek what is best for everyone.  True Christians and Jews recognize that and put God’s law before man’s law when the two conflict. Dictators fear true Christians and Jews because the dictator cannot force them to disobey God. There are many that believe they are Christians and Jews and may even attend church or synagogue, but when forced to choose, they choose to obey man and not God. Many who attended Christian churches supported Hitler when he came to power or at least stood by and did nothing when he exterminated the Jews, those who were crippled, and the mentally deficient, because they knew what Hitler would do to them if they opposed him. They put their own interest ahead of God’s law and preferred to play it safe.  Many Christians did choose to obey God and spoke out against Hitler, and Hitler put many of them in prison or killed them. Dictators may severely punish those who stand up for God, but God’s people know that the rewards in the end are well worth it.  The church today faces a similar choice. It can remain silent as it did in Germany, or it can choose to stand up for God.

 

Politics-AB-R

08 Nov

It really upsets me to see the liberal media promoting their agenda and realize that a lot of people actually believe them. I saw an article talking about how we can be assured that democracy will prevail this election because a larger than normal percentage of the young people are turning out and they tend to vote for Democrats because they believe in truth, the rule of law, and the freedoms granted us by the Constitution. I had to read it several times to be sure the writer actually said what it appeared to say. I believe him when he says that a larger than normal percentage of young people are going to vote and that they tend to vote for Democrats. What I cannot believe is that he wrote that they vote for Democrats because they believe in truth, the rule of law, and the freedoms granted us by the Constitution. First, liberal Democrats who now control the Democratic Party and most of the media believe that there is no inherent truth, truth is what benefits them and the media is an open demonstration of their lack of respect for truth. Second, they took the Bible, the Ten Commandments, and the Constitution out of our schools, openly pass laws that violate the Constitution, have judges that violate Supreme Court decisions in making lower court decisions, and call for defunding the police, which is why many young people have no respect for the rule of law. Third, they openly trample on the Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms in promoting their agenda. If young people really believed in truth, the rule of law, and the freedoms granted us by the Constitution, they wouldn’t vote for Democrats.

 

 
No Comments

Posted in Politics

 

Politics-AB-Q

08 Nov

President Biden has directed the federal bureaucracy to enable government employees to get around the State laws in States banning abortions by assisting them to travel to States that allow abortions. He is also pressuring State Medicaid providers to cover out of State abortions. That is a  open affront to the States. Medicaid is a State funded medical plan for welfare recipients in the State. Since it is State-funded, it is for the residents of that State. By pressuring them to cover abortions for non-residents, it is violating the laws governing the program. State residents should not have to pay for elective medical procedures for people from out of State and the federal government should not be telling the States how to run their programs. His intent is to enable residents of States that do not allow abortions to travel to States that allow abortions and still get their abortions paid for, so Planned Parenthood doesn’t lose money. If Planned Parenthood loses money, they will have less money to contribute to political campaigns for liberal politicians.

 

 

Gas Prices-G

02 Nov

President Biden has been talking up how gas prices are dropping slightly. While he is responsible for the price drop, I wouldn’t be proud of it if it were me. Prices are dropping because people are driving less. They are being hurt by the high price of gas and by inflation, so they are limiting their driving. Gas stations are lowering their prices to encourage people to drive more. President Biden has been draining our oil reserves to bring down oil prices but it is leaving us short on reserves if we face another hurricane like Katrina that shuts down the offshore oil wells. The Canadian pipeline was supposed to provide a backup but President Biden shut that down as well so we have no backup if our oil supply is threatened. President Biden has figured out another way to control the price of gas and that was to extend the time allowed to use fuels containing ethanol.  It creates a lot more pollution than regular gas, so it is restricted in summer when people do the most driving.  Gas with 70% ethanol was promoted in the beginning because ethanol is made from plants which are renewable so we would use less gas but it required that engines be specially made to handle it so it can’t be used in older cars that weren’t made for it. It gained a lot of support from environmentalists concerned about us running out of oil, but they turned against it when they found it created more pollution. Many embraced it because it was 40-50 cents less a gallon until they realized they got a lot less miles per gallon, so it really wasn’t the bargain it appeared to be. I used it for a while because it was cheaper until I found it was actually costing me more for gas every week due to the reduced gas mileage. Not many people use it anymore, so few stations carry it. Some stations use gas with 10% ethanol. There is usually a sticker telling you but most people probably don’t notice it. Overall, it probably won’t have much effect on gas prices and most people won’t realize the reduced gas mileage, so it is mainly a publicity stunt before the elections to make it look like he is trying to solve it in order to counter his failing popularity.

 
 

Ninth Sunday of Kingdomtide-Nov 6

02 Nov

The Rule of Law Those who serve God view the law far differently than those who don’t. Those who make the law can always change it. If man makes a law, he can change it when he feels like it. If a friend violates the law, he can ignore it and if he doesn’t like someone, he can enforce the law harshly or even invent a law to trap his opponent. We are seeing politicians who do not respect the law and are harassing their opponents by accusing them of things they aren’t doing, while ignoring their own followers who are violating the law. However, when one serves God, he is aware that God makes the law and no one is above the law. Samuel was able to call King David to task for violating the law. He was still subject to the law, even though he was the king. In addition, only God can change the law. No one can excuse their friends from obeying the law because God is the final judge.  People may break the law because they figure they won’t be caught but God sees and will hold them accountable on judgement day.

 
No Comments

Posted in Politics

 

Politics-AB-P

02 Nov

Liberal candidates are hammering out the message that Republicans are trying to abolish Medicare and Social Security. If that were true, my inbox would be flooded with messages from the many Seniors groups I belong to but not one has mentioned it. Since liberal candidates have been known to be constantly lying about what their opponent stands for, I don’t put much credit in it. They have a long history of lying about their opponents to discredit them and turn off voters who would vote for them, and have very little credibility. You need to look at those things they vote for on the floor of Congress when you decide who to vote for. That tells you what they really support and what they oppose. In addition, they say you should never look a gift horse in the mouth (Don’t question the quality of a gift) but you need to look at who is paying for it. Liberals have been passing out your money to everyone to get people to vote for them but that money is coming out of your pocket in the form of higher taxes. It is estimated that over 50% of Covid relief money was obtained through fraud. That is billions of dollars of your money which went to people who were either not eligible or illegally cashed a check for someone who had died. In addition, their policies are creating inflation which is robbing you at the grocery store and higher interest rates which are hurting low income people the most. They want to expand the number of those on welfare so they can get them to vote for them by claiming that their opponent wants to cut the number of people on welfare. However, those of you working know that your taxes are paying for the welfare benefits to many people who don’t want to work and would rather draw money from the government. While there are many people on welfare who really need help, a lot of people get help that don’t need it. When I worked for the welfare dept, they had an income limit for assistance. If you made over that, you weren’t eligible. If you made under that, you were eligible. It was based on eligibility, not on need. If you made under the limit, you were eligible, even if your expenses were low due to low housing costs. However, someone making over the limit wasn’t eligible, even if they had high housing costs and there was no money left for utilities. In addition, while recipients were required to look for work, and were not allowed to turn down a legitimate job offer, many made a poor showing at job interviews so they would not be offered a job. At that time, workers supervised people in their area, however now problems are handled in the State office and  clients don’t have individual caseworkers. Without close supervision, it is hard to detect fraud.  I stopped by the house of one of my clients one day and found it empty. A neighbor told me that they had moved out of the county (so they were not eligible to receive assistance from that county) and were returning to pick up the checks. She told me she collected their mail and they picked it up regularly. She also gave me the address in another county where they were living. Needless to say, their welfare checks got stopped.

 

 

 
No Comments

Posted in Politics