RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Violence and Gun Control’

Violence-2-AI

19 Sep

The rhetoric of liberal media and politicians points to a set of values that they have been pushing for years but have recently been more open about. They have been pushing abortion as a woman’s right in spite of the fact we now know decisively that it is a baby with a heartbeat and brainwaves. They are saying in effect, the mother’s right to happiness supersedes the baby’s right to life. Once you make that statement, it merely becomes a matter of who you feel stands in the way of your happiness. We are seeing that their feelings are not limited to the unwanted baby in the womb. They are also pushing assisted suicide and mercy killing for the sick, the injured, the elderly, and those  who are mentally disturbed. They feel those people are a burden and should be eliminated. They have been very quiet about it because the majority of Americans still value life but they have been quietly pushing it in areas they find open to it like Oregon. Other countries like Canada and many European countries are more open to them and openly practice them because they don’t have the strong Christian values that were prevalent in America up until the 1960’s and 1970’s. When you are trying to convince someone of something, it is frustrating to have someone express an opposing opinion, especially if they can back up their opinion with facts. Charlie Kirk was challenging them to back up their arguments with facts and they knew they could not do that because their opinions are based on feelings, not facts. Therefore he posed a threat to their attempts to convince people, so they feel he needed to be eliminated.

 

 

Violence-2-AH

19 Sep

Since the killing of Charlie Kirk, we have seen many liberals who express joy that he was killed or say he deserved to die. Many are being fired from their jobs. There are many who are saying that they should not be fired because they are merely exercising their free speech. What about Kirk, he was just exercising his right to freedom of speech and he was killed. Liberals tend to see themselves as deserving rights but deny those rights to those they don’t agree with. But the question goes beyond a question of free speech. Speech reveals one’s mindset. If I was an employer, I would not want someone working for me who expressed joy that those who don’t agree with them were killed. What happens when one of their fellow employees says something they don’t agree with. Are they going to bring a gun to work and kill them. What happens if the company does something they feel is wrong, will they bring a gun and shoot up the office. We have not heard of workplace violence in a long time but it is still happening, it just isn’t big news like it was.  We haven’t heard of school shootings much lately either but they still happen. They are no longer big news. The American public got tired of hearing about them and the media ratings dropped so they realized  they had to tone it down. However, the danger is still there and employers are still concerned about it.

 

 

violence and social strife-3-H

13 Sep

It is interesting to hear the rhetoric of the media and liberal politicians in response to the response of President Trump to the killing of Charlie Kirk. They say he is inciting people to violence. Lets look at the facts. Liberals call on their followers to attack anyone who supports Trump and they should kill him. Those people have not done anything wrong, they just stand in the way of liberals getting what they want. That certainly leads people who have low self control and very few scruples against killing to attack and even kill Trump supporters. The liberal politicians and media  say their followers should riot in the streets to show their opposition to what Trump does. They feel that is all protected by freedom of speech and doesn’t lead people to violence. They say we should take away guns from innocent people so they can’t defend themselves against criminals who hide their guns so they won’t be taken away. They also say we should defund the police so they won’t be able to protect innocent citizens from those same criminals. They also say we shouldn’t punish criminals for minor crimes. We should allow them to go back out on the street where they can commit major crimes. On the other hand, we have Trump who calls on the police to seek out and arrest these people who go around attacking and killing other people, so they can be tried in court and if convicted, should be punished by putting them in jail, where they cannot commit more crimes. Liberals feel that is hate speech and should be banned because it leads people to violence.  The only ones incited to riot by calls for justice are liberals who hate police and the court system. However calling on liberals to attack conservatives does incite liberals to violence. Since it enrages those conservatives who do not like being attacked, it may also occasionally lead conservatives to attack liberals. They bring up examples where someone attacked an abortionist or an abortion clinic while ignoring almost daily attacks against pro-life pregnancy centers and Catholic churches that call for an end to abortion. It is hypocrisy to think that an isolated attack on a liberal is a threat to democracy while almost daily attacks on conservates do not pose a threat.

 

 

Violence-gun control 4-S

11 Sep

While the media often boldly calls for gun control after major shootings, they are strangely silent when the target is a conservative politician or political activist, a church, or a Christian school. When several Republican Congressmen were shot at a ball field, there was silence. When a gunman attacks a church or Christian school, there is silence. Apparently they feel it is alright to shoot their opponents. The recent shooting of the leader of Turning point USA did not bring out the media frenzy that you usually hear. Charlie Kirk started Turning Point to spread conservative information to public school and college students to help bring sanity to our schools but apparently liberals felt he was too great a threat to their agenda.

 

 

Violence-2-AF

04 Sep

I find it interesting that the mayor of Washington D.C. is protesting the presence of national guard to restore order. President Trump called up the national guard to patrol the streets of Washington D.C. and threatens to do so elsewhere. The mayor of Chicago has also vigorously protested. Washington D.C. and Chicago are among those cities with the highest crime rate in the nation. In a recent weekend in Chicago, 28 people were killed. That doesn’t include robberies, car thefts or other crimes. Residents of Washington D.C. are breathing easier for the first time in a long time. They can finally walk the streets without fear of being attacked since there has been almost no crime in the city. Crooks are probably laying low since they know that the National guard will arrest them and not turn a blind eye. They also know that they will not be let off with a mere slap on the wrist. Laws are meaningless unless they are enforced. Criminals who know that they do not stand much chance of being arrested and if arrested will be let off with just a slap on the wrist will not hesitate to commit crimes. President Trump is showing that crime can be reduced with proper enforcement.

 

Violence-2-AE

04 Sep

Many increasingly feel that our democratic processes aren’t working, and we are being told that only a strong government can solve the problem. The American people must not allow themselves to think strong government will solve the problems it has created. The increasing actions of liberal judges and politicians to ignore the will of the people, the Constitution, the laws of the land, and the Supreme Court create a mounting frustration of the American people. That boiled over during the Obama administration and led to the election of Donald Trump. However, the liberal media was silent about his success in restoring the economy and the power to the American people. Their repeated attacks on President Trump and lies about him have given the American people the false impression that President Trump failed, further fueling their frustration. The January 6 demonstration in Washington is an indication of how widespread that frustration is. However, their innocent intentions pointed out the greater danger. That is that liberals will use the frustration to seize control of the government. They continue to claim that the danger posed by conservative demonstrations requires that the rights of the American people be suspended, however the real problem is that it was the suspension of the rights of the American people that fueled the demonstrations and further suspending those rights will not solve it. It was the heavy-handed actions of the king that led to the Boston Tea Party and it was the heavy-handed response to it that led to the Revolutionary War. Maybe we should pay attention to history.

 

 

Violence-2-AD

04 Sep

I find it interesting how difficult it is for some people to connect the dots. Liberals are repealing laws designed to protect homeowners who are protecting their family and their homes, they want to take away your guns so you can’t protect yourself, and they want to defund the police so there will be less police to defend you. This hurts minorities the most since the cities pull police out of minority areas to avoid conflict. Liberal politicians tell the police not to interfere with rioters and mobilize the media against police pressuring the courts to convict police to avoid further rioting whether the officers are guilty or not. As a result, police are afraid to enter situations that may be used against them and avoid potentially dangerous situations. That encourages rioters to attack police since they know the police either aren’t allowed to fight back, or are afraid to. In addition, liberal courts let criminals off with very little punishment, so it becomes easier to commit crimes without fear of being caught or being punished. That makes you an easy target for crime and assault. In fact, crime and murders have skyrocketed in areas controlled by liberals because criminals know that they are less likely to be caught or prosecuted. Yet the voters continue to vote these people back into office. Is it really that hard to see what direction things are headed? As another round of elections comes up, maybe it is time for a change.

 

 

Violence-social strife 2-AD

13 Jun

The media is in a frenzy about how President Trump is overstepping his authority and interfering with California’s sovereignty  and the San Francisco mayor and California governor are screaming about it. However, we need to look at the facts. The governor and mayor were refusing to turn over illegal migrants to immigration authorities in violation of the law. Immigration authorities proceeded to arrest the migrants in accord with the law. The governor and mayor sought to prevent them in violation of the law. Protestors showed up to demonstrate against the arrests. Their “peaceful” protests involved burning cars, looting neighborhood stores, and assaulting immigration officers, however neither the mayor or governor attempted to interfere with the rioters.  President Trump sent the national guard to protect the immigration authorities. That is under his authority because the rioters are preventing federal agents from doing their job, it’s called, obstruction of justice. Neither the mayor or the governor were protecting their citizens so  President Trump had to step in to protect American citizens. The riots were too well organized and the rioters too well equipped to be spontaneous. We now know that the rioters were funded by  organizations supported by the Democratic party which explains why the governor and mayor did not interfere. Over half of the rioters were from out of State which means they crossed State lines to commit a crime making it a federal offense. President Trump was well within his rights and was fulfilling his responsibilities. Contrast that to a few years ago when President Biden sent federal agents to intervene in State affairs. President Biden was not protecting the border which was a violation of his oath of office to defend the country against invasion. He was also violating federal law by not building the border wall as required by an act of Congress. Texas and Arizona were forced to build barriers to protect their citizens which is their responsibility in light of the fact the federal government failed to do so. President Biden then sent in immigration agents to tear down the walls. While President Trump had the authority to protect the American people, President Biden did not have the authority to use federal agents to prevent the governors from protecting their citizens. The media said nothing about President Biden’s abuse of power but have been relentless in misrepresenting President Trump’s legitimate exercise of his authority.

 

 

Violence-Gun Control-I-E

06 Jun

In one shooting in Florida, for instance, the shooter went on a shooting rampage until police arrived. He then ditched the guns and ammunition and blended in with the fleeing students. In spite of the fact that it was one of the largest schools around, there was only one armed security guard in the entire school. Many schools that have been attacked have not had any security guards resulting in needless bloodshed that could have been stopped sooner had there been armed guards on duty. While armed citizens can’t stop all shootings, they can limit the number of deaths by stopping the shooter before he is able to fully carry out his attack. Many shooters come armed with multiple rapid fire weapons and a large quantity of ammunition and if they aren’t stopped quickly, they can cause a large number of injuries and deaths. It normally takes a while for police to assemble a strike force to isolate and take down a shooter and in that time, the shooter can kill or wound a large number of people, unless he is taken down by someone on the scene with a gun. Schools , malls, and churches have been favorite targets because there usually isn’t anyone likely to be carrying a gun to stop them.

 

 

Violence-Gun Control-I-D

06 Jun

Usually when an attacker targets a number of people, the media screams for gun control but after two recent attacks, they hardly said a word. The attacks were briefly mentioned and then ignored. The reason was that the attackers did not use guns. One used a knife while the other threw flammable liquid on the people. When a shooting occurs, the media and Democrats rush to call for a ban on guns but they ignore the fact that a number of tragic shootings have been cut short by security guards or citizens with permits to carry guns who risked their life confronting the shooter and were able to take him down and prevent further bloodshed. While the law used to protect homeowners that defended themselves, their families, and their property, the law in many States has been corrupted to punish gunowners who try to stop an attacker and gunowners risk jail time and heavy fines in trying to stop an attacker. While those seeking to ban guns claim it will reduce gun deaths, gun deaths actually increase since the criminals still have guns and don’t have to be afraid that they will be confronted by someone with a gun. As a result, other States have passed laws protecting those who use guns in self defense.  The goal is to ban guns in the hands of ordinary citizens so  they can not resist a government takeover by those who want to  seize control of the government. It was a favorite tactic of Hitler, Stalin, and other dictators.