RSS
 

Archive for the ‘violence and social strife’ Category

Violence-2-AI

19 Sep

The rhetoric of liberal media and politicians points to a set of values that they have been pushing for years but have recently been more open about. They have been pushing abortion as a woman’s right in spite of the fact we now know decisively that it is a baby with a heartbeat and brainwaves. They are saying in effect, the mother’s right to happiness supersedes the baby’s right to life. Once you make that statement, it merely becomes a matter of who you feel stands in the way of your happiness. We are seeing that their feelings are not limited to the unwanted baby in the womb. They are also pushing assisted suicide and mercy killing for the sick, the injured, the elderly, and those  who are mentally disturbed. They feel those people are a burden and should be eliminated. They have been very quiet about it because the majority of Americans still value life but they have been quietly pushing it in areas they find open to it like Oregon. Other countries like Canada and many European countries are more open to them and openly practice them because they don’t have the strong Christian values that were prevalent in America up until the 1960’s and 1970’s. When you are trying to convince someone of something, it is frustrating to have someone express an opposing opinion, especially if they can back up their opinion with facts. Charlie Kirk was challenging them to back up their arguments with facts and they knew they could not do that because their opinions are based on feelings, not facts. Therefore he posed a threat to their attempts to convince people, so they feel he needed to be eliminated.

 

 

Violence-2-AH

19 Sep

Since the killing of Charlie Kirk, we have seen many liberals who express joy that he was killed or say he deserved to die. Many are being fired from their jobs. There are many who are saying that they should not be fired because they are merely exercising their free speech. What about Kirk, he was just exercising his right to freedom of speech and he was killed. Liberals tend to see themselves as deserving rights but deny those rights to those they don’t agree with. But the question goes beyond a question of free speech. Speech reveals one’s mindset. If I was an employer, I would not want someone working for me who expressed joy that those who don’t agree with them were killed. What happens when one of their fellow employees says something they don’t agree with. Are they going to bring a gun to work and kill them. What happens if the company does something they feel is wrong, will they bring a gun and shoot up the office. We have not heard of workplace violence in a long time but it is still happening, it just isn’t big news like it was.  We haven’t heard of school shootings much lately either but they still happen. They are no longer big news. The American public got tired of hearing about them and the media ratings dropped so they realized  they had to tone it down. However, the danger is still there and employers are still concerned about it.

 

 

violence and social strife-3-H

13 Sep

It is interesting to hear the rhetoric of the media and liberal politicians in response to the response of President Trump to the killing of Charlie Kirk. They say he is inciting people to violence. Lets look at the facts. Liberals call on their followers to attack anyone who supports Trump and they should kill him. Those people have not done anything wrong, they just stand in the way of liberals getting what they want. That certainly leads people who have low self control and very few scruples against killing to attack and even kill Trump supporters. The liberal politicians and media  say their followers should riot in the streets to show their opposition to what Trump does. They feel that is all protected by freedom of speech and doesn’t lead people to violence. They say we should take away guns from innocent people so they can’t defend themselves against criminals who hide their guns so they won’t be taken away. They also say we should defund the police so they won’t be able to protect innocent citizens from those same criminals. They also say we shouldn’t punish criminals for minor crimes. We should allow them to go back out on the street where they can commit major crimes. On the other hand, we have Trump who calls on the police to seek out and arrest these people who go around attacking and killing other people, so they can be tried in court and if convicted, should be punished by putting them in jail, where they cannot commit more crimes. Liberals feel that is hate speech and should be banned because it leads people to violence.  The only ones incited to riot by calls for justice are liberals who hate police and the court system. However calling on liberals to attack conservatives does incite liberals to violence. Since it enrages those conservatives who do not like being attacked, it may also occasionally lead conservatives to attack liberals. They bring up examples where someone attacked an abortionist or an abortion clinic while ignoring almost daily attacks against pro-life pregnancy centers and Catholic churches that call for an end to abortion. It is hypocrisy to think that an isolated attack on a liberal is a threat to democracy while almost daily attacks on conservates do not pose a threat.

 

 

Violence-2-AF

04 Sep

I find it interesting that the mayor of Washington D.C. is protesting the presence of national guard to restore order. President Trump called up the national guard to patrol the streets of Washington D.C. and threatens to do so elsewhere. The mayor of Chicago has also vigorously protested. Washington D.C. and Chicago are among those cities with the highest crime rate in the nation. In a recent weekend in Chicago, 28 people were killed. That doesn’t include robberies, car thefts or other crimes. Residents of Washington D.C. are breathing easier for the first time in a long time. They can finally walk the streets without fear of being attacked since there has been almost no crime in the city. Crooks are probably laying low since they know that the National guard will arrest them and not turn a blind eye. They also know that they will not be let off with a mere slap on the wrist. Laws are meaningless unless they are enforced. Criminals who know that they do not stand much chance of being arrested and if arrested will be let off with just a slap on the wrist will not hesitate to commit crimes. President Trump is showing that crime can be reduced with proper enforcement.

 

Violence-2-AE

04 Sep

Many increasingly feel that our democratic processes aren’t working, and we are being told that only a strong government can solve the problem. The American people must not allow themselves to think strong government will solve the problems it has created. The increasing actions of liberal judges and politicians to ignore the will of the people, the Constitution, the laws of the land, and the Supreme Court create a mounting frustration of the American people. That boiled over during the Obama administration and led to the election of Donald Trump. However, the liberal media was silent about his success in restoring the economy and the power to the American people. Their repeated attacks on President Trump and lies about him have given the American people the false impression that President Trump failed, further fueling their frustration. The January 6 demonstration in Washington is an indication of how widespread that frustration is. However, their innocent intentions pointed out the greater danger. That is that liberals will use the frustration to seize control of the government. They continue to claim that the danger posed by conservative demonstrations requires that the rights of the American people be suspended, however the real problem is that it was the suspension of the rights of the American people that fueled the demonstrations and further suspending those rights will not solve it. It was the heavy-handed actions of the king that led to the Boston Tea Party and it was the heavy-handed response to it that led to the Revolutionary War. Maybe we should pay attention to history.

 

 

Violence-2-AD

04 Sep

I find it interesting how difficult it is for some people to connect the dots. Liberals are repealing laws designed to protect homeowners who are protecting their family and their homes, they want to take away your guns so you can’t protect yourself, and they want to defund the police so there will be less police to defend you. This hurts minorities the most since the cities pull police out of minority areas to avoid conflict. Liberal politicians tell the police not to interfere with rioters and mobilize the media against police pressuring the courts to convict police to avoid further rioting whether the officers are guilty or not. As a result, police are afraid to enter situations that may be used against them and avoid potentially dangerous situations. That encourages rioters to attack police since they know the police either aren’t allowed to fight back, or are afraid to. In addition, liberal courts let criminals off with very little punishment, so it becomes easier to commit crimes without fear of being caught or being punished. That makes you an easy target for crime and assault. In fact, crime and murders have skyrocketed in areas controlled by liberals because criminals know that they are less likely to be caught or prosecuted. Yet the voters continue to vote these people back into office. Is it really that hard to see what direction things are headed? As another round of elections comes up, maybe it is time for a change.

 

 

Violence-social strife 2-AD

13 Jun

The media is in a frenzy about how President Trump is overstepping his authority and interfering with California’s sovereignty  and the San Francisco mayor and California governor are screaming about it. However, we need to look at the facts. The governor and mayor were refusing to turn over illegal migrants to immigration authorities in violation of the law. Immigration authorities proceeded to arrest the migrants in accord with the law. The governor and mayor sought to prevent them in violation of the law. Protestors showed up to demonstrate against the arrests. Their “peaceful” protests involved burning cars, looting neighborhood stores, and assaulting immigration officers, however neither the mayor or governor attempted to interfere with the rioters.  President Trump sent the national guard to protect the immigration authorities. That is under his authority because the rioters are preventing federal agents from doing their job, it’s called, obstruction of justice. Neither the mayor or the governor were protecting their citizens so  President Trump had to step in to protect American citizens. The riots were too well organized and the rioters too well equipped to be spontaneous. We now know that the rioters were funded by  organizations supported by the Democratic party which explains why the governor and mayor did not interfere. Over half of the rioters were from out of State which means they crossed State lines to commit a crime making it a federal offense. President Trump was well within his rights and was fulfilling his responsibilities. Contrast that to a few years ago when President Biden sent federal agents to intervene in State affairs. President Biden was not protecting the border which was a violation of his oath of office to defend the country against invasion. He was also violating federal law by not building the border wall as required by an act of Congress. Texas and Arizona were forced to build barriers to protect their citizens which is their responsibility in light of the fact the federal government failed to do so. President Biden then sent in immigration agents to tear down the walls. While President Trump had the authority to protect the American people, President Biden did not have the authority to use federal agents to prevent the governors from protecting their citizens. The media said nothing about President Biden’s abuse of power but have been relentless in misrepresenting President Trump’s legitimate exercise of his authority.

 

 

Violence-Gun Control-I-F

06 Jun

The problem isn’t guns, it is the loss of respect for life and the calls of liberals to eliminate those who get in your way. Since abortion was allowed, those pushing abortion have told women that  they can eliminate the problem baby easily by aborting it. While they may push the narrative that it isn’t really a baby, the woman usually will later find out that it is.  The message is clear, if someone gets in your way, eliminate them. It is further demonstrated by their push to legalize assisted suicide and termination of those who are critically injured or ill. They also attack their political opponents in court with false charges to discredit them so liberal candidates can win the election. They also urge their followers to run anyone supporting their opponents out of  their business, and engage followers in attacking crisis pregnancy centers and churches that support them. Hundreds of crisis pregnancy centers and churches have been vandalized or set on fire since President Biden actively began attacking his opponents. Numerous conservative politicians and public figures have been shot at, and some have been fatally wounded.

 

 

Previous Posts 16/16

30 Nov

This is the sixteenth in the series of previous posts and highlights

The Evangelism, Male-female relations, Senior issues, and violence & social strife

Click on the links below to access those series.

 

Social Strife-2-AC

18 Jul

It was a surprise that we were not inundated by rhetoric calling for banning guns after the attempt on Donald Trump’s life, though the media has often been silent after other attempts on the life of prominent conservatives so it doesn’t bring attention to it, so it is not too surprising. President Biden called for us to tone down the rhetoric and draw together as a nation. That is surprising for him though it may relate to the fact that it is approaching election time and he is suffering from miserable polls. Most of the hate speech has come from Democrats who have demonized their opponents  and called on their supporters to drive people out of restaurants and other public places for wearing MAGA hats and T-shirts. They refuse to debate issues and attack their opponents character and families to divert attention away from the issues. Though some Republicans have also, it has predominantly been prominent Democrats like President Biden and Nancy Pelosi. In addition, Democrats have continued to claim that Republicans are responsible for the violence and continually bring up January 6th, although the January 6th “riot’ was not really very violent. There were no guns used or rocks and bottles thrown. The people merely pushed their way into the capital building and the only person shot was a woman who was trying to stop the rioters and she was shot by a security guard. They completely ignore the left-wing gangs like Black Lives Matter and others who have terrorized cities attacking police and prominent Democrats who have called for defunding the police. The violence went on for several years and involved millions of dollars in destruction and numerous police and innocent bystanders being killed or injured. Their idea of violence is standing outside an abortion clinic praying or standing up in a school board meeting and questioning why the school allows boys to share the girls restrooms and showers with the girls. Apparently they don’t feel that the continual burning and vandalizing of churches and pro-life women’s clinics  falls under the category of violence, because they would rather hunt down and prosecute people praying in front of abortion clinics and parents objecting at school board meetings then investigate the continual vandalism and destruction of churches and pro-life centers. It is important that we elect candidates that respect life and the rule of law.