RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Economics’ Category

Government Economics-II-I

30 Dec

While President Biden totes his massive spending bill (one of several) he talks about the fact that it won’t cost the average American because they will be taxing the rich and large corporations. It sounds nice but ignores basic economics. First, there aren’t enough rich to pay the price for the spending they want. Second, the rich won’t pay it. They will hide their money in tax free accounts. That will take money out of circulation which would normally be used to create new businesses and expand old ones. Next, taxing big corporations would hurt the average American because businesses would pass the cost on to the consumer (you and me) in higher prices for goods and services. That would hurt the poor, the retired, and others on fixed incomes who wouldn’t get pay raises. The less business, the less taxes coming in. Lastly, increased revenue only fuels their desire to spend more so the added money won’t pay down the debt.

 

 

Government economics-II-H

30 Dec

It is really upsetting to see the rhetoric flying about the budget proposal. The Democrats are accusing the Republicans of refusing to give in and increase the debt limit when that is a two-way street. The Democrats aren’t giving in on cutting spending. The Democrats just want to up the debt limit so they can continue their wasteful spending. The Republicans gave in so they couldn’t be accused of shutting down the government and so we got saddled with a huge increase in spending again. It is time we call a stop to the wasteful spending and require our legislators to live within their budget like everyone else has to. Raising the debt limit will only put off the inevitable need to cut spending. The debt is getting so large it is hard to even pay the interest on it and allowing it to increase will only increase the interest. Eventually it will reach the point where we can’t pay the interest, let alone pay on the principle. It is time we demand that our law makers honor their campaign promises and cut spending. They won’t do it on their own, the American people have to demand that they do so.

 

 

Government economics-II-G

30 Dec

President Biden just ordered a raise for federal employees. After robbing the average American by fueling inflation by pushing through massive new spending  and crippling the American energy programs, he turned around and hurt them again by pushing through huge new taxes. Now, he is rewarding the bureaucrats who already make fantastic salaries, and who are almost immune from firing due to strong unions, supported by laws enacted by liberal Democrats. The increased  cost of those raises will raise the budgets of federal agencies, however, there is nothing in the Constitution that authorizes the President to order expenditures from the treasury. The House must initiate and approve all budget items and they must be approved by the Senate. Once passed by Congress, the President has the authority to approve them or veto them, but can not change them. President Biden seems to think he can take the law into his own hands and change it at his own discretion.

 

 

Voting-2-AB

11 Oct

Polls show that very few, only 3%, of voters consider a candidate’s value of life as a priority when voting. If a candidate does not value life unless it has value to him, he will do anything to cater to you as long as you have value to him, but ignore you the moment you no longer have value to him. The vast majority of voters say that the economy is their number one concern, showing how much the American people have been corrupted by greed, placing personal gain above protecting life. However, the administration’s record on the economy is as bad as its record on protecting life. While the administration and media are trying to convince you that the economy is looking up, all you have to do is look around you and you can tell the economy is in serious trouble. The administration has been handing out generous gifts to lure voters to vote for them and printing money like never before to pay for those gifts. The money is being handed out indiscriminately with no requirement of need. Many people were working and did not need the money.  With all the free money, many are buying luxuries, not necessities, which is fueling inflation. With a lot of excess money, many people are willing to pay higher prices. With high demand and a shortage of goods due to the administrations poor handling of the economy, sellers are pushing to get as much for their goods as possible, which leaves low income and fixed income people paying more and often doing without. Many store shelves are empty because those with extra money are buying wholesale and stockpiling or reselling scarce items at a  profit so many goods never reach the shelves. The administration knows that people will be upset by the rising prices and that they have to pay for all the free money they give out, so they are raising taxes to pay for the generous gifts and raising interest to reduce the money available and slow the inflation. However, this also hurts low income and fixed income people most because they can least afford the higher taxes and interest. Since most people have money taken out for taxes, they won’t notice the higher taxes. They will not notice a difference in what they owe or get back at the end of the year because the amount taken out will be increased to cover the added taxes. The administration is giving away money openly to get votes and then taking it away secretly so they will not lose votes. The question is, do you want to reelect those who force you to continue paying high prices for goods and high taxes and interest rates, or do you want to elect someone who will stop the wasteful spending, reduce the rate of inflation, and bring down taxes and interest rates like we saw under President Trump.

 

 
 

Schools-2-N

20 Sep

President Biden is pushing a massive student loan forgiveness program to buy student votes. It is only one more of his massive spending programs which are fueling inflation due to the massive influx of money flooding the economy. It is estimated to cost almost one trillion dollars. Such a massive expenditure is unfair to all those of us who paid for our educations. It took me ten years to pay off my student loans from college and ten years to pay off my loans from graduate school, but I did it because I felt that it was worth the cost. My wife went back and finished her college. and we paid off her loans as well. That has been the normal for those who chose to go to college in the past. It is also unfair to students and their parents who saved up for their education, and those young people who went into the Armed Services to cover the cost of their college. This doesn’t benefit those who need it most because many of those that needed it did not go to college because they could not afford it and didn’t want to get saddled with massive debts. It benefits those in the middle and upper class who could afford to go to college. In addition, college isn’t for everyone. Many choose jobs that don’t require college. Paying college debts is bad policy because it will lead many to go to college that don’t need it in anticipation of the government covering the cost. In addition, many won’t take their education seriously because they won’t have to sacrifice for it. I saw that while teaching in college. The students that got welfare payments to attend college often were more interested in getting credit for the course than in learning. They complained because half of their grade was based on their attendance, so they had to show up to get a good grade. In addition, government money pushes up the cost of college. It is simple supply and demand. Schools take advantage of the government funds. If colleges charge $1000 a semester and the government offers $1000 a semester, the schools will raise their rates to $2000 to get the government money. We saw that with Obamacare. In addition, the President does not have the authority to order the use of tax dollars to pay private debts because spending bills have to be passed by Congress.

 

Government finances-II-F

23 Aug

The Bible says that there will be a world dictator who will seize control in the last days but it does not say when it will occur. It could be any time. For that to happen, there must be a world-wide crisis that will force the nations to unite under one world government. President Obama pushed the nation deep into debt to support his failing economic policies. He supported his spending by printing trillions of dollars of money which was worthless because the money was not backed by anything. It was basically a promise to pay. President Trump reversed many of those policies and tried to get us back on a firm financial policy, but President Biden has restored many of those policies and inflation has returned. That is dangerous since most nations today are stockpiling American dollars because it is more sound than any other currency. That contained inflation temporarily. However, many nations are seeing the possible collapse of the American dollar and shifting to precious metals and other currencies so that we could face a sudden collapse in the value of the American dollar as other nations begin selling them off. If that happens, American dollars could become worthless overnight causing the collapse of our economy. If the United States collapses, it will take down a great deal of the world because they are so dependent on us and could easily lay the groundwork for a world-wide dictator to take power. I go into government and economics in “Truly In The World, But Not Of It-part B” under “Government” and “Economics”.

 

 

Government finances-II-E

23 Aug

Liberals just passed the $20 billion dollar “Inflation Reduction Act” and it was signed into law. They are promoting it as a great success. However, you need to be aware of what they have succeeded in doing. They will promote it as a great accomplishment in reducing inflation, however examining the facts will point out certain problems. First, they are responsible for the inflation with the massive spending bills that they have passed. Inflation is caused by a lot of money available with few goods to purchase. Goods are in short supply due to their failed economic policies and adding more money will only accelerate the inflation. To counter that, the bill includes massive new taxes on the middle class to reduce the money supply. As a result, the middle class will lose due to both inflation and higher taxes. They passed out a massive amount of money in the form of free benefits to make people grateful to them and vote for them, but nothing is ever free. They now have to take back all the money they gave out but it will be buried in your tax bill so most people won’t see  it, because it will be just a line item on their paystub. People will be grateful for the benefits and not realize how high a price they are paying for them. The rich will shift their funds to non-taxable funds and raise prices on what they sell so the main burden will fall on the middle class. The inflation is usually followed by a recession due to declining sales. The middle class lose again as declining sales reduce work and income, while the rich benefit by writing off their loses as tax deductions. As a result, the middle class lose both ways. Second, the bill includes funds for a massive number of new IRS agents who will join the large number of FBI agents that President Obama hired just before leaving office in harassing and threatening conservatives who oppose their liberal policies.

 

 

Economics-I-G

09 Jun

Government regulations support big businesses, leaving small businesses struggling so our production is being concentrated in larger and larger companies. Government contracts require extensive paperwork which favors big companies who have the staff to complete it. When I worked for the Area Agency on Aging, we had one company that mowed lawns in the entire nine county area. They charged $56 for mowing a lawn (back in the late 1990’s) when local companies probably could have done it for far less, but other companies nearby lacked the staff to write government contracts. In addition, the company was able to charge that because they had no competing companies offering to do it for less. In addition, smaller local companies are better able to respond to customer needs and competition keeps down prices. Being local, they do not have the excessive cost of transporting workers and equipment and can charge less. This is extremely dangerous because it concentrates wealth in the hands of a few, but more important, it leaves us vulnerable to disruptions in production when problems occur. We saw that in meat when the largest meat producer had to shut down due to Covid and now with the shortage of baby food due to the shut down of the largest baby food producer due to contamination at its main plant. In addition, government contracts provide tools for the government to dictate what the company does and how they do it. We are seeing that in our public schools where schools are being pressured to use programs promoting sexual promiscuity and special privileges for Gays in spite of local opposition. America was built on free enterprise, but we are gradually losing it.

 

 
 

Previous Posts 9/15

02 Oct

This is the ninth in the series of previous posts and highlights
unions, Economics, Media, Health Care

Click on the links below to access those series.