RSS
 

Second Sunday of Epiphany-Jan 15

11 Jan

 

When we read the Gospels, we often see the teachings and miss what Jesus does. If we read them closely, we will notice that He met needs as He went along. He healed the blind man, the crippled man, and the leper. He also fed the people. He did it primarily because He cared about them, but He also did it because He knew those needs distracted those people from hearing what He had to say. Until He broke down the barrier, they could not concentrate on what He was saying. By meeting the need, He not only broke down the barrier, He also built a bridge to that person. Those people passed many people as they traveled but those people were only nameless faces, soon forgotten. Jesus was someone they would not soon forget. He wasn’t a nameless face, He was the one that healed them or fed them. He was the one who cared when no one else did. We have become accustomed to the government providing all those services, but we forget that Christians met those needs first and only later did the government become involved. Now we have all but given up our ministry to the government and people worship the government instead of God. The prevailing feeling among many Christians today, as well as non-Christians is “The government is my shepherd, I shall not want, It maketh me lie down in a nice house, and It provideth me with good food.”  Christ modeled the way we should live, unfortunately, all we like sheep have gone astray.

 

 

Economics-Government Finances-H-B

09 Jan

Social Security-Liberals in Congress have an interesting view of the world when it comes to Social Security. Originally, very few elderly lived long after retirement. Most worked until they died or became disabled. With a large number of workers paying into it, and few drawing on it, it amassed a large surplus. Workers felt they could rest assured that the money would be there for them when they retired. Social Security is in trouble of going broke because liberals raided it to pay for their welfare programs. Had that money remained on deposit gathering interest, we would not be facing the question of it becoming insolvent. Liberals did not take into account changes going on in our society. More working women meant less children.  That meant more money pouring in, but it also meant fewer future workers to pay into the system. They also pushed abortion which has killed one out of every three babies conceived. Improving health has meant Seniors live longer and many are retiring at the earliest age of retirement which means they are not paying in as long but are drawing benefits longer. Without the funds from the surplus, retired Seniors are drawing benefits currently being paid in by workers. With fewer workers paying in and a growing number of retirees drawing longer, it has created the mess we now face. Liberals could help the situation by restoring the funds they took, but they feel it is more important to bribe people to vote for them with huge giveaways then to repay what they took from Seniors. Liberals feel the solution is to raise the limit on income taxed and use the increase revenue to raise benefits for those who are receiving the lowest benefits. That sounds good on paper but looks terrible when you examine the facts. There are very few at the top and the small amount raised will not be much help for the large number of people at the bottom so it is really only a token gesture. Since the new money received would go right back out, it also would not extend the life of Social Security. Conservatives would rather raise the lower age of retirement. They did it a couple times but liberals discontinued it. However, it makes sense because many people are still healthy when they retire and able to work up to 20-30 years after retirement due to improved health. My parents had a printing business and both worked for 20 years after retirement. The only reason they had to stop was because they were attacked by thieves who left them homebound. Before the attack, they were still very healthy and probably could have worked for quite a while longer. By delaying retirement, workers would pay into Social Security longer. Since the rate of death increases with age, the number of Seniors declines with age. That means that a large number of people would continue paying in, but fewer people would be drawing out and would not be drawing out as long. Those whose health did not allow them to work up to the new age of retirement could still get Social Security disability like those currently under 62.

 

 

Economics-III-C-A

08 Jan

Canada just passed a law  banning home ownership by foreigners. They feel that foreigners are taking advantage of low housing prices due to the pandemic and are buying up houses as an investment. The United States has an even bigger problem which politicians are reluctant to address. China is buying up a lot of businesses and farmland which poses a threat to our security. First, they are appropriating the business secrets from the electronic, manufacturing, and technical companies they buy up. In addition, they are moving the headquarters of the companies and much of their manufacturing plants to China resulting in mass layoffs in the U.S. and loss of tax money. The businesses and farmland they buy up gives them leverage in our economy and drains money from our economy to support their economy. Wesaw during the early days of the pandemic how dangerous it is to depend on China. A great deal of our medicines and medical equipment are made in China and when the pandemic broke out, China supplied their people first and we had to wait a long time before we got the life-saving equipment we needed. President Trump provided help to American companies by lowering corporate taxes and reducing regulations, as well as helping them begin producing what we needed but we were playing catchup and lost critical time that cost lives. President Biden has returned to supporting Chinese companies by giving them favorable trade allowances and hurting American companies because he has raised corporate taxes and increased government regulations, making it very hard for them to compete.

 

 
 

Housing/Homelessness-B-B

08 Jan

In the United States, we have seen the purchase of housing by rental agencies for many years, making housing more expensive and less available for ownership. This is especially a problem in rural areas which were often elderly people who moved off  the farm into small towns. When they died or went into a nursing home, rental agents bought up the houses. As a result, towns that used to have a high level of home ownership now have a much lower level. Rental units have a high level of turnover and renters usually have no commitment to the town. The result has been increased crime and towns no longer are close knit communities like they once were. Renters often don’t get to know their neighbors because they don’t plan on staying very long. The increase in rentals have also broken down the close knit neighborhoods in many cities. Home ownership brings more stability because people plan on staying a while and are more likely to get to know their neighbors. When people know their neighbors, they recognize the presence of strangers who may be bent on committing crimes, but when people don’t know their neighbors, they do not usually notice strangers and there is often more crime. This was true in the inner-city and is becoming more common in more established neighborhoods.  Part of it is driven by the fact that young families are no longer able to purchase homes as easily and may rent until they get established and can purchase a home, however part of it is the result of the increased mobility in this country. People no longer keep the same job for most of their life but are forced to move frequently in search of new jobs due to layoff or because they are no longer satisfied with their job, so they are more likely to rent than to purchase a home. As a result, homeownership has dropped and there is increased demand for rental property.

 

 
No Comments

Posted in Housing

 

First Sunday of Epiphany-Feb 8

04 Jan

Reveal the Reason- When my wife and I were young, we would go out before Christmas to see the light displays. They depicted all kinds of things from Manger scenes to Santa Claus scenes and many others. Today, there are far fewer displays, and most are just lights. They are nice to look at but not nearly as interesting. Christmas is an excellent time to put up a display of the manger scene. Liberals have gotten them banned from a lot of public places, so it is up to churches and individual Christians to remind people why we celebrate Christmas. Children are curious. They may ask you, why do you have a display of people in the front yard? It gives you the opportunity to tell the Christmas story of how God sent Jesus to help us. Start planning now to be a witness for Christ next Christmas. Buy a commercial one or build your own. Christmas cards also give an opportunity to remind people why we celebrate. Now is a good time to get them because stores are getting rid of their Christmas stock at sale prices

 

 

Video-Basic Christian Beliefs-study course

04 Jan

As of today, I am offering my course on Basic Christian Beliefs as a free introductory course.  (time 1 hr, 50 min. )

Basic Christian Beliefs study course-

promo   https://youtu.be/lQ5xsrYtTqw

Course URL  https://www.udemy.com/course/basic-christian-beliefs/?referralCode=45EA0BA6DAD6F47E7541

 

 

Meaning of Epiphany-Video-Jan 6

04 Jan

 

Government Economics-II-I

30 Dec

While President Biden totes his massive spending bill (one of several) he talks about the fact that it won’t cost the average American because they will be taxing the rich and large corporations. It sounds nice but ignores basic economics. First, there aren’t enough rich to pay the price for the spending they want. Second, the rich won’t pay it. They will hide their money in tax free accounts. That will take money out of circulation which would normally be used to create new businesses and expand old ones. Next, taxing big corporations would hurt the average American because businesses would pass the cost on to the consumer (you and me) in higher prices for goods and services. That would hurt the poor, the retired, and others on fixed incomes who wouldn’t get pay raises. The less business, the less taxes coming in. Lastly, increased revenue only fuels their desire to spend more so the added money won’t pay down the debt.

 

 

Government economics-II-H

30 Dec

It is really upsetting to see the rhetoric flying about the budget proposal. The Democrats are accusing the Republicans of refusing to give in and increase the debt limit when that is a two-way street. The Democrats aren’t giving in on cutting spending. The Democrats just want to up the debt limit so they can continue their wasteful spending. The Republicans gave in so they couldn’t be accused of shutting down the government and so we got saddled with a huge increase in spending again. It is time we call a stop to the wasteful spending and require our legislators to live within their budget like everyone else has to. Raising the debt limit will only put off the inevitable need to cut spending. The debt is getting so large it is hard to even pay the interest on it and allowing it to increase will only increase the interest. Eventually it will reach the point where we can’t pay the interest, let alone pay on the principle. It is time we demand that our law makers honor their campaign promises and cut spending. They won’t do it on their own, the American people have to demand that they do so.

 

 

Government economics-II-G

30 Dec

President Biden just ordered a raise for federal employees. After robbing the average American by fueling inflation by pushing through massive new spending  and crippling the American energy programs, he turned around and hurt them again by pushing through huge new taxes. Now, he is rewarding the bureaucrats who already make fantastic salaries, and who are almost immune from firing due to strong unions, supported by laws enacted by liberal Democrats. The increased  cost of those raises will raise the budgets of federal agencies, however, there is nothing in the Constitution that authorizes the President to order expenditures from the treasury. The House must initiate and approve all budget items and they must be approved by the Senate. Once passed by Congress, the President has the authority to approve them or veto them, but can not change them. President Biden seems to think he can take the law into his own hands and change it at his own discretion.