RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Important Issues-Intro-C

28 Apr

The danger is in being reactionary. They come out with a radical proposal like banning the cutting of trees to save the environment. While that is a worthy goal, it would put thousands of lumberjacks, newspaper people, and carpenters out of work and deprive us of wood needed to make paper and build houses. Conservatives immediately came back with opposition to it, which paints them as unconcerned about the damage we are doing to the environment. However, calmer heads realized the damage from each of those positions and enacted laws to require companies to plant a tree for every tree they cut down. That saved the jobs and continued to provide the lumber we need without damaging the environment. We need to be careful about just reacting and insist on a full examination of the issues in order to find a middle ground. While they insist that their ideas are based on science and conservative ideas are just baseless ideas, the fact is that a full examination of their positions show that their ideas are often based on appearances which can be deceiving. To counter their ideas, we must seek the facts to back up our position. They say that a baby is not fully formed until it is born, however we now have ultrasounds that shows that it is fully formed and we can detect a heartbeat and brainwaves within a couple weeks of conception, showing that it is a complete person and fully functioning by the time that most babies are aborted.

 

 
No Comments

Posted in Politics

 

Important Issues-Intro-B

28 Apr

While liberals call for an open mind and open discussion, their actions indicate they have a far different attitude. The second article illustrated what I mean. It told about a town that was opposed to the liberal agenda. What was disturbing was that it painted those who opposed the agenda as terrorists seeking to overthrow the government and silence opposition. This has become a common tactic of theirs to silence opposition. The reporting in the regular media is very biased in favor of liberals and they have heavily censored conservative voices on the social media. In addition, President Biden has called on the FBI to investigate those who speak up in school board meetings as domestic terrorists in order to threaten and intimidate parents to remain silent. It is obvious they have no intention of allowing an open discussion and keeping an open mind. They want to freely state their case, but refuse to allow the expression of any other views. As a result, those who want to vote intelligently must do their own research and share what they learn.  I have continued to research the topics and share what I learn, however I reach only a very small portion of the American audience and rely on faithful friends to share what they learn with their friends.

 

 
No Comments

Posted in Politics

 

Important Issues-Intro-A

28 Apr

I just saw a series of disturbing stories on the net which I feel need to be addressed. The first story was titled “How do you know someone is a Democrat?”. It stated that they want everyone to be open-minded and engage in open discussion on the topics, so I will be dealing with them in the next couple of weeks. It laid out 15 points which it states that a Democrat stands for. It was a good description of what we are hearing on the media. What was disturbing was that they were set out in a way that it is hard to disagree with. Everything sounded good and what we can all support. However, what is disturbing is that what we hear in the media is not what we are seeing in practice, and as they say, actions speak louder than words. Unfortunately, many voters are listening to the words and not paying attention to the actions. While those who vote for Democrats may support those issues, the fact is that the way Democrat politicians vote shows they have a far different understanding of the issues. While I cannot go into an issue in detail in a single post, the posts will have links to other things that I have posted on the topic so you can get a more in depth understanding of the issues.

 

 
No Comments

Posted in Politics

 

Freedom of Religion-B-T

19 Apr

There have been growing liberal attempts to destroy the churches by what they call a First Amendment mandated separation of  church and State in the Constitution. However, their work reveals, at the least, a complete ignorance of the Constitution, and at the extreme, a contempt for it and all those who believe in it. The Constitution clearly states that Congress shall make no laws to establish religion, prohibit free exercise of it, or abridge freedom of speech. It not only does not authorize the government to do these things, as liberals claim, it specifically prohibits the government from doing so. Yet, liberals have sought to remove Bibles, crosses, manger scenes, the Ten Commandments, and even the Constitution from our schools, libraries, and government buildings. During the Obama administration, federal judges demanded that pastors turn over their sermons to make sure they weren’t preaching against programs like abortion and Gay rights, which liberals promoted. They have fined and jailed those who refused to participate in things condemned by God such as Gay marriages, and forced taxpayers to fund activities like abortion which violate their beliefs.

 

 

Freedom of Religion-B-S

19 Apr

Our forefathers came to the United States to escape the State supported churches that used their government influence to threaten and intimidate other churches in order to maintain their monopoly. Our founding fathers wrote into the Constitution a specific Amendment which forbid government interference with churches to protect them from the rise and domination of a State sanctioned religion. Our forefathers then wrote into the tax laws specific exemptions for churches to prevent the government from interfering with churches. It made churches tax exempt since the power to tax is the power to destroy. They also released the churches from filing the financial disclosure information required of regular non-profit organizations since filing it would open the churches to potential scrutiny that could lead to government intervention and control. Formerly, churches were held in high regard, even by unbelievers, because of the good which the churches did in their communities. Not only did they hold their members to a higher standard of morals, they also provided care and relief to those in the community through church benevolence and social services. Now social services have been divorced from the churches and is carried out mostly by the government and independent non-profit organizations and the church is no longer held in high regard. In fact, many cities now try to restrict the expansion of churches through zoning laws that prevent churches from expanding or building new buildings. They would rather have a business there that would produce tax revenue. Many liberal government officials also talk quietly about taxing churches which would provide a huge windfall for city and State governments, as well as for the federal government, but do not dare try it because of the huge backlash they would get from churches.

 

Freedom of Religion-B-R

08 Apr

Attorney Generals of twenty two liberal controlled States have asked federal agencies to end all “conscience” provisions in the Affordable Care Act. That would allow those government agencies to force doctors and nurses to perform abortions and sex change operations and force pharmacists to dispense abortion pills and gender blocking drugs, even when they believe they are wrong. The Biden Administration is also considering a regulation that would enable government agencies to screen out conservatives in the hiring practice in direct violation of Civil Service regulations that mandate that people be hired based on merit rather than political policies. The administration and various liberal politicians have been openly vocal in stating that conservatives, particularly pro-life and Trump supporters are not capable in serving in government positions. Now they want to make it general government practice. The Civil Service laws were created to prevent politicians from passing out government jobs to reward their supporters. The new regulation would allow the agencies to fill government jobs with their supporters and block them from opponents. Those of us who worked for the Census Bureau experienced that when President Biden took over. We were forced to submit new applications for the positions we had already been hired for. We had passed a criminal background check when hired under the Trump administration but were required to undergo two background checks before we could continue working. The first was the standard criminal background check but we were never told what the second one was. It apparently was a check of our political affiliation which is a direct violation of the civil service law. I passed the first but after the second one, my application disappeared and no one ever found it. These are just two more steps in creating a totalitarian government where citizens must think and do what the government requires and all thinking and acting that deviates is crushed.

 

 

Freedom of Religion-B-Q

08 Apr

The Postal Service has started requiring workers to work on Sunday and denied a worker’s request to have Sunday off to attend church. A federal court has ruled that federal worker have no right to attend church. President Biden is seeking the Supreme Court to restrict the right of workers to attend church. It is a continuation of attempts by the administration and liberal radicals to shut down churches. If federal agencies can deny workers the right, it could easily be extended to private employers. Liberal politicians tried to shut down churches during the pandemic on the excuse they were not essential services and tried to keep them shut even after other group meetings were allowed. They know that committed Christians will not bow to their liberal agenda and recognize the power of a church committed to serving God in derailing their plans  to abolish the Christian faith. It is bad enough that many school sporting events have begun meeting on Sunday and do not allow students to be on the team unless they agree to attend Sunday morning practices and meets. Unfortunately, many churches are urging members to deny their faith and submit to the liberal agenda. When the liberal agenda contradicts the will of God, the Christian must choose between serving God and serving man. We cannot serve both.

 

Sanctity of Life-A-4-AC

29 Mar

While abortion supporters focused on the fact that we didn’t know if an unborn baby was a person yet, it was  just a smoke screen for their true intentions. They would turn a full term baby around and deliver only the head, kill it, and then deliver it the rest of it so they could justify it because the baby was killed before it was born. They are now going further and leaving babies born alive to die and are seeking to legalize killing babies after birth. In Canada and Europe, they have gone farther to include the critically sick and injured, the aged, and even those who are healthy and those who feel life is no longer worth living. They can no longer justify it by claiming that we don’t know if it is a person yet because once it is born, it is definitely a person and is protected by the Constitution. In essence, they are seeking to get rid of those who are a burden on them, which has been their intention all along. We are seeing the same thing in politics and other parts of society. If someone gets in your way, you eliminate them. Liberal politicians seek to eliminate those who they feel get in their way of ambition and power. While they may not physically kill them, they seek to destroy them politically or socially. God is love while the devil seeks only to kill and destroy. You will know all men by which one they support.

 

 

 

Sanctity of Life-A-4-AB

29 Mar

Now that Roe vs Wade has been overturned and children can now be protected by law, those who support abortion are showing their true colors. In the 1970’s, they cried about the poor girls trapped with an unwanted baby. Since America was predominantly pro-life, they knew they could not get a vote of the people or of the legislature, so they got the Supreme Court to declare that unborn  babies weren’t yet people and so not protected by law, just as it had done with Black people when it said slaves weren’t people and not protected by law. That made laws against abortion unenforceable. They knew that many people felt killing was wrong because it was illegal but could be swayed to accept it if abortion became legal. The ruling didn’t actually make it legal, but it allowed them to begin performing abortions openly, without fear of punishment. Once they were performed openly, it gave the appearance that it was legal. While they focused on unborn babies, their narrative has always been that this baby is a burden and a hindrance to these girls and the way to solve the girl’s problem is to get rid of the baby. They have continued to press the narrative that the baby is a burden and the way to solve the problem is to get rid of the baby. They can not push their agenda of eliminating unwanted people as long as people value life so they have sought to destroy the understanding of life as worth protecting and replace it with the idea that life is expendable when it becomes a burden.

 

Politics-AB-AA

27 Mar

President Biden continues to take the law into his own hands and use his office to override the will of Congress and the American people. He has used the FBI and the Dept of Justice to harass and threaten former President Trump, conservatives involved in opposing abortions, and parents involved in protecting their children. He has used his office to force federal employees to get Covid shots and to violate State laws by performing abortions and distributing abortion inducing drugs in States that outlaw abortions. He has now pushed through regulations to make millions of gun owners who legally own guns and use them responsibly into criminals if they don’t register their guns and/ or get rid of them. Such regulations will not make our streets any safer, all they will do is tell the government where the guns are so they can seize them if they choose. They claim to be making the streets safer but their regulations have done the opposite. In major cities who have the strictest gun laws, they also have the highest rate of gun deaths because the criminals have guns and do not have to be afraid that those they attack will be armed because the government took the guns away from the general public. All we have to do is compare the results of Presidents like Calvin Coolidge and Franklin Roosevelt to see the results that come from a presidency that allows Americans to shape their own future on the one hand and those that try to solve the problems through government control on the other. For those not familiar with those Presidents, I have posted videos on them on my Facebook and Linked-in pages.