RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Voting’ Category

Voting-AC

03 Nov

When I talk to people about voting, they echo what they hear in the media. They do very little, if  any, research on their own. With the way issues are deliberately written to confuse voters and widespread censorship of the media, that means they often vote for issues that go against everything they believe.  The current issue in Ohio is a perfect example. The issue begins by prohibiting abortion after the baby is viable and when there is a threat to the mother’s life which have widespread support and is already included in current Ohio law. Then they add an exception clause that allows an exception for when the doctor feels it is  a threat to the mother’s health which they use to allow abortion on demand up until birth. It also prevents any interference by anyone, including parents of minor children. While those two clauses seem innocent enough, they are loopholes that abortionists use to get around the prohibition against abortion after the baby is viable, and even leaves the determination of when the baby is viable to the doctor. It  does not specify abortion but uses the term medical services to also include contraceptives and sex change medications and surgery to get around parent opposition to them, so they can sell young girls and boys on them. Young girls are listed as adults with no resources so they can bill Medicaid for the cost. Their advertising is also deliberately misleading. They state that the change is needed because the current law does not allow for exceptions for rape or a threat to the mother’s life which is an outright lie because it does. In addition, the change does not state that it allows an exception for rape but they make allowance for it in the doctor’s determination of threat to the mother. Voters have a responsibility to research the issues before they vote on them because many approve things like abortion without realizing it.

 

 
No Comments

Posted in Voting

 

Voting-I-AQ

10 Jul

Liberals are again facing embarrassment for their rhetoric. They made a big deal of the Georgia voting law passed just before the 2022 election requiring Voter ID claiming it was racist and would prevent many Blacks from voting. The media picked up the cry and openly broadcast their statements. Large corporations even pulled programs from Georgia hurting the State financially to force them to repeal it. Yet Georgia experienced a record number of voters in the 2022 election including more Blacks than before. While post-election surveys revealed no one who was hindered in voting, liberals have continued similar attacks on voter laws passed by other States after the election. Experience is showing an increase in voting, especially by Blacks, who express more confidence that their vote will count, yet neither liberals nor the media have apologized or admitted they were wrong. Many people I talk to still believe that conservatives that push election protection laws are trying to prevent people from voting so they can win. The only ones they are preventing from voting are those who are voting illegally. Voters must stand up and demand their legislators enact voter protection laws to prevent the many cases of election fraud which have occurred since liberal attemptsto break down safeguards to election safety.

 

 
 

Voting-I-AP

17 Nov

It sounded like the liberal politicians were preparing people for foul play. They told people that the races where Republicans are ahead would be just red mirages since Democrats tend to vote later and through the mail. That sounds like they were planning a replay of the Georgia election in 2020. They will wait for most of the ballots to be counted and when they know how much they are going to lose by, a large number of mail-in ballots will show up with no envelope so there is no postmark and no signature to compare against the signature on the ballots so they can’t be verified as legitimate. Under mail-in rules, either lack of signature on the envelope or lack of postmark would disqualify them but the ones in charge of the counting chose to count them anyway and so a win for Trump became a win for Biden and it changed the election. While there may not have been any tampering with the vote, mail-in voting leaves a lot of room for tampering, which raises the possibility that there might have been. A lot of Republicans were ahead in the beginning of this election but as the night wore on, the tallies turned more for Democrats so the Democrats won the Senate though they lost the House. Mail-in ballots do not allow for ID or face verification like a walk-in ballot does. While a signature on the envelope and a postmark show it was mailed and the ballot was filled out by  the one that mailed in the ballot, it does not guarantee that the person mailing it is the one registered to vote. In addition, the ballot passes through many hands and any one of them could remove the ballots and replace them with a pre-made-up ballot. Without an envelope, there isn’t even any guarantee that it even came through the mail. It is very convenient to sit at home and drop your ballot in the mail but it is too easy for someone to tamper with the ballot enroute to the polling place.

 

 
 

Voting-I-AO

30 Oct

President Biden is filing lawsuits against States with laws protecting voting safety such as voter ID laws, and laws against paid collectors, and election day registration just before the election to get the  courts to block enforcement of the laws in order to allow widespread fraud. While they claim the laws will prevent people from voting, the only ones prevented from voting will be those who aren’t eligible to vote. Past experience has shown that more people vote when there are laws in place to prevent illegal voting because voters are more confident that their votes will count. Some courts are responding by nullifying the voter protection laws and allowing fraud. For instance, Montana enacted laws to protect the voting process against fraud. A judge has struck them down as “unconstitutional” even though they were passed by a lawfully elected legislature.

 

 
 

Voting-1-AM

18 Oct

While President Biden continues to claim there is no evidence of voter fraud, he ignores the facts. A Democrat in Arizona was just convicted of ballot harvesting while she was mayor and was sentenced to jail. This is not a recent development. This is only the latest in a stream of convictions for voter fraud stemming from the 2016 and 2020 elections. and does not count those that the administration refuses to investigate. A Virginia college student was convicted of filling out voter registration forms with names of people who had died. According to the American Patriot Daily, a government study of 350,000 voters in Virginia showed that 9000 had been rejected for jury duty because they were not US citizens and therefore not eligible to vote. A study of 1000 Virginia voters who were not citizens showed that 200 of them actually voted.  Some go back further. In 2008, ACORN was barred from receiving government funds or registering voters after it was found that many of the voters it registered were ineligible. Yet, in 2012, President Obama was caught funneling taxpayer money to ACORN who was operating under a different name but using the same offices and personnel. That, along with President Obama’s attempts to prevent the States from removing voter registrations of those who had died or moved out of State and were no longer eligible, shows clear intent to assist those committing voter fraud. While Democrats oppose voter ID laws and removing the names of those no longer eligible, it is the only way to prevent widespread voter fraud.

 

 
 

Voting-2-AC

12 Oct

Look at the issues Early balloting will begin for many early in October but many voters are being swayed by the rhetoric and very few voters are looking at the issues. The media is concentrating on the verbal battle between the candidates as they criticize their opponent’s qualifications and the media is avoiding talking about the candidate’s stand on the issues while continuing to trash Donald Trump and anyone associated with him. Yet the election has come down to a question of sharp contrasts. I do not promote one candidate or the other, but point out the stands they take on different issues. This election could be critical to the future of our nation because the two basic groups choose different paths that could have widely differing consequences for our nation. Don’t take my word for it, review the candidate’s speeches and follow the money as I have. Sadly, few people will take the time. Liberal politicians say you should never discuss politics because they know that an informed voter is not easily fooled and they would rather you sleep in ignorance while they run the country.  Special interest groups will tell you who they support because they want you to vote for the candidates that support their views. Groups like Right to Life and Planned Parenthood will tell you who they support on life issues. The National Rifle Association will tell you who they support on Gun issues. The League of Women’s voters will often have a list of candidates in your area and what issues the candidates support. The Congressional Record  will usually tell how representatives voted on each bill, unless it was a voice vote. Regardless of what issues they say they support, you can tell if they  support on issue or not by how they vote.

 

 
 

Voting-2-AB

11 Oct

Polls show that very few, only 3%, of voters consider a candidate’s value of life as a priority when voting. If a candidate does not value life unless it has value to him, he will do anything to cater to you as long as you have value to him, but ignore you the moment you no longer have value to him. The vast majority of voters say that the economy is their number one concern, showing how much the American people have been corrupted by greed, placing personal gain above protecting life. However, the administration’s record on the economy is as bad as its record on protecting life. While the administration and media are trying to convince you that the economy is looking up, all you have to do is look around you and you can tell the economy is in serious trouble. The administration has been handing out generous gifts to lure voters to vote for them and printing money like never before to pay for those gifts. The money is being handed out indiscriminately with no requirement of need. Many people were working and did not need the money.  With all the free money, many are buying luxuries, not necessities, which is fueling inflation. With a lot of excess money, many people are willing to pay higher prices. With high demand and a shortage of goods due to the administrations poor handling of the economy, sellers are pushing to get as much for their goods as possible, which leaves low income and fixed income people paying more and often doing without. Many store shelves are empty because those with extra money are buying wholesale and stockpiling or reselling scarce items at a  profit so many goods never reach the shelves. The administration knows that people will be upset by the rising prices and that they have to pay for all the free money they give out, so they are raising taxes to pay for the generous gifts and raising interest to reduce the money available and slow the inflation. However, this also hurts low income and fixed income people most because they can least afford the higher taxes and interest. Since most people have money taken out for taxes, they won’t notice the higher taxes. They will not notice a difference in what they owe or get back at the end of the year because the amount taken out will be increased to cover the added taxes. The administration is giving away money openly to get votes and then taking it away secretly so they will not lose votes. The question is, do you want to reelect those who force you to continue paying high prices for goods and high taxes and interest rates, or do you want to elect someone who will stop the wasteful spending, reduce the rate of inflation, and bring down taxes and interest rates like we saw under President Trump.

 

 
 

Voter safety-I-IM

05 Aug

Liberals keep hammering on how conservatives are trying to corrupt the election process and steal the election, but it is the liberals who are pressing for the loopholes to allow ballot tampering and fake ballots. If I thought my opponent was trying to steal the election, I certainly would not hand him the tools to do it. I would be fighting to close every loophole as soon as possible to make sure my opponent was not able to steal the election, like conservatives are trying to do. It is interesting that liberals are fighting every attempt to close the loopholes that allow ballot tampering. They are fighting Voter ID, allowing voting by mail, preventing voting stewards from getting close enough to actually be able to spot any ballot tampering, allowing ballot harvesting by unauthorized personnel, not cleaning the voter rolls. They all enable voting by those not eligible to vote, or allow fake ballots to be entered into the system and are being pushed by liberal politicians who claim conservatives are trying to steal the election. Frankly, I would go with the evidence and not with accusations that present no proof.  The people need to guard their ballot system carefully or it could be stolen from them. Voters can no longer rely on politicians and will need to initiate and pass ballot issues requiring voter ID, ban voting by mail, allow voting stewards to actually supervise the ballot counting, and ban ballot harvesting by unauthorized personnel. In addition, they should vote out politicians who refuse to clean up the voting rolls or follow voting rules.

 

 
 

Previous Posts 10/15

05 Nov

This is the tenth in the series of previous posts and highlights
Voting, Politics, Legislation, Supreme Court

Click on the links below to access those series.