RSS
 

The Courts-B-AH

06 Sep

Liberals are accusing the Supreme Court of ignoring its own rulings in upholding the right of Texas to ban abortions after a heartbeat is detected. They are not ones to talk. They openly ignore State and federal laws, the Constitution, and Supreme Court rulings whenever they don’t agree with them. Planned Parenthood is continually in violation of federal law banning the harvesting and selling of body parts and frequently violates Rowe vs Wade by killing babies who have survived an abortion or allowing them to starve to death. Since they have been born, it is evident that  they are alive and so are protected by the Constitution. Rowe vs Wade stated that since we didn’t know when life begins, the courts could not protect unborn babies. Since babies who survived abortions have been born, they are not unborn babies and so are not covered by Rowe vs Wade. However, the Supreme Court has often reviewed and changed previous rulings. If they had not overturned the Dred Scott decision, Blacks would still be slaves. Besides, the Supreme Court did not overturn its own decision. In Rowe vs Wade, the Supreme Court stated that if the moment when life begins is ever defined, the Court’s decision was null and void. Since Texas has defined when life begins (the existence of a heartbeat) , the courts in the State are obligated to protect babies after it is determined that the baby has a heartbeat. The presence of a heartbeat has been the determination of the existence of life since the beginning of recorded history. When the heart stops, it is felt that life has ceased so the existence of a heartbeat is used to determine that life exists.

 

 

Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.